Radical Interpretation, Feminism, and Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter’s main topic revolves around Davidson’s account of radical interpretation and the concept of triangulation as a necessary feature of communication and the formation of beliefs. There are two important implications of this model of belief formation for feminists studying the effects of social location on knowledge production generally, and the production of scientific knowledge in particular. The first is Davidson’s argument that whatever there is to the meaning of any of our beliefs must be available from the radical interpreter’s external, third-person perspective. The second important implication of triangulation is that Davidson’s model is a holistic one that shows that there is no substantive difference in the triangulation process by which we form beliefs concerning basic descriptive features of the world and beliefs concerning evaluative features of the world.
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLORIF
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-11-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-11-28

Total views
364 ( #17,783 of 2,448,703 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,267 of 2,448,703 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.