Strong, therefore sensitive: Misgivings about derose’s contextualism

Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):237-253 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to an influential contextualist solution to skepticism advanced by Keith DeRose, denials of skeptical hypotheses are, in most contexts, strong yet insensitive. The strength of such denials allows for knowledge of them, thus undermining skepticism, while the insensitivity of such denials explains our intuition that we do not know them. In this paper we argue that, under some well-motivated conditions, a negated skeptical hypothesis is strong only if it is sensitive. We also consider how a natural response on behalf of DeRose appears to be equally available to his primary rival (viz., the sensitivity theorist).

Author's Profile

Jeffrey W. Roland
Louisiana State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-27

Downloads
464 (#19,101)

6 months
75 (#13,781)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?