In defense of Nietzschean genealogy

Philosophical Forum 30 (4):269–288 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Using Alasdair MacIntyre as a foil, I defend what I take to be a viable Nietzschean genealogical account, showing that a proper perspectivism is neither perniciously subjectivist nor absolutist. I begin by arguing against MacIntyre’s assertion that genealogists are committed to the view that rationality requires neutrality and that as there is no neutrality, there is no rationality. I then continue by offering something of a reconstruction of Nietzsche’s view, designed partly to clarify the error pinpointed in MacIntyre’s arguments, but primarily to amplify the Nietzschean solution. This reconstruction involves claiming that Nietzsche is committed to three different senses of “truth:” the “Truth” (with a capital “T”) of correspondence theories, “truth” which is really pragmatic knowledge that helps us survive, and, finally, “truth” that is nothing more that “metaphors and metonyms” which are falsely taken to be useful to survival.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COHIDO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
106 ( #42,525 of 2,445,324 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #54,924 of 2,445,324 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.