Skeptical theism is incompatible with theodicy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Inductive arguments from evil claim that evil presents evidence against the existence of God. Skeptical theists hold that some such arguments from evil evince undue confidence in our familiarity with the sphere of possible goods and the entailments that obtain between that sphere and God’s permission of evil. I argue that the skeptical theist’s skepticism on this point is inconsistent with affirming the truth of a given theodicy. Since the skeptical theist’s skepticism is best understood dialogically, I’ll begin by sketching the kind of argument against which the skeptical theist’s skepticism is pitched. I will then define ‘skeptical theistic skepticism’, offer a precise definition of ‘theodicy’, and proceed with my argument.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COLSTI
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-10-31
Latest version: 2 (2016-10-31)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-17

Total views
295 ( #22,700 of 2,455,360 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #34,664 of 2,455,360 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.