Do Machines Have Prima Facie Duties?

Gary Comstock

Do Machines Have Prima Facie Duties?

In Machine Medical Ethics. London: Springer. pp. 79-92 (2015)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers

Abstract

A properly programmed artificially intelligent agent may eventually have one duty, the duty to satisfice expected welfare. We explain this claim and defend it against objections.

Keywords

satisficing utilitarianism act utilitarianism machine ethics medical ethics robotic ethics AI ethics R. M. Hare Gary Varner W. D. Ross artificial agents

Categories

Biotechnology Ethics in Applied Ethics

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, Misc in Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Informed Consent in Medicine in Applied Ethics

Machine Ethics in Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Robot Ethics in Applied Ethics

(categorize this paper)

PhilPapers/Archive ID

COMDMH

Revision history

Archival date: 2018-04-16
View upload history

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-16

Total views
62 ( #30,808 of 41,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #19,560 of 41,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.

Applied ethics	Epistemology	History of Western Philosophy	Meta-ethics	Metaphysics	Normative ethics
Philosophy of biology	Philosophy of language	Philosophy of mind	Philosophy of religion	Science Logic and Mathematics	More ...