The Case against bGH

Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):36-52 (1988)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In the voluminous literature on the subject of bovine growth hormone (bGH) we have yet to find an attempt to frame the issue in specifically moral terms or to address systematically its ethical implications. I argue that there are two moral objections to the technology: its treatment of animals, and its dislocating effects on farmers. There are agricultural biotechnologies that deserve funding and support. bGH is not one of them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
111 ( #35,072 of 54,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,058 of 54,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.