Disgust’s Transparency

British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):347-354 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The transparency thesis for disgust claims that what is disgusting in nature is always also disgusting in art. Versions of the thesis have been endorsed by, among others, Kant, Lessing, Mendelssohn, and, more recently, Arthur Danto, Carolyn Korsmeyer, and Jenefer Robinson. The present paper articulates and discusses different readings of the thesis. It concludes that the transparency thesis is false.

Author's Profile

Filippo Contesi
Universitat de Barcelona

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-24

Downloads
592 (#13,402)

6 months
33 (#31,954)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?