Disgust’s Transparency

British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (4):347-354 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The transparency thesis for disgust claims that what is disgusting in nature is always also disgusting in art. Versions of the thesis have been endorsed by, among others, Kant, Lessing, Mendelssohn, and, more recently, Arthur Danto, Carolyn Korsmeyer, and Jenefer Robinson. The present paper articulates and discusses different readings of the thesis. It concludes that the transparency thesis is false.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CONDT
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Perspective on Disgust.Rozin, Paul & Fallon, April E.
Aesthetic Disgust?Robinson, Jenefer
Disgust and Aesthetics.Korsmeyer, Carolyn

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-24

Total views
287 ( #10,846 of 40,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #6,097 of 40,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.