Vague Comparisons

Ratio 29 (4):357-377 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some comparisons are hard. How should we think about such comparisons? According to John Broome, we should think about them in terms of vagueness. But the vagueness account has remained unpopular thus far. Here I try to bolster it by clarifying the notion of comparative vagueness that lies at its heart.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CONVC
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-08-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A More Plausible Collapsing Principle.Andersson, Henrik & Herlitz, Anders

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-22

Total views
578 ( #3,444 of 37,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #3,364 of 37,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.