Essence, Modality, and Identity

Mind:fzab017 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a recent article forthcoming in *Mind*, Leech (2020) presents a challenge for essentialist accounts of metaphysical modality: why should it be that essences imply corresponding necessities? Leech’s main focus is to argue that one cannot overcome the challenge by utilizing an account of essence in terms of generalized identity due to Correia and Skiles (2019), on pain of circularity. In this reply, we will show how to use identity-based essentialism to bridge ‘epistemic’ and ‘explanatory’ understandings of this alleged essence-to-necessity gap without circularity, Leech’s arguments notwithstanding. We do so by first presenting a novel proof that generalized identities imply corresponding necessities. We then propose several substantive identity-based explanations of how it is, exactly, that essences imply necessities.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COREMA-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-09-05
Latest version: 3 (2021-02-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-05

Total views
356 ( #18,823 of 2,454,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
98 ( #6,186 of 2,454,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.