Can folk aesthetics ground aesthetic realism?

The Monist 95 (2):241-263 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We challenge an argument that aims to support Aesthetic Realism by claiming, first, that common sense is realist about aesthetic judgments because it considers that aesthetic judgments can be right or wrong, and, second, that becauseAesthetic Realism comes from and accounts for “folk aesthetics,” it is the best aesthetic theory available.We empirically evaluate this argument by probing whether ordinary people with no training whatsoever in the subtle debates of aesthetic philosophy consider their aesthetic judgments as right or wrong. Having shown that the results do not support the main premise of the argument, we discuss the consequences for Aesthetic Realism and address possible objections to our study.
Reprint years
2014
ISBN(s)
0026-9662
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COVCFA
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-08-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Aesthetic Adjectives: Experimental Semantics and Context-Sensitivity.Shen-yi Liao & Aaron Meskin - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):371–398.
Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics.Florian Cova, Amanda Garcia & Shen-yi Liao - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):927-939.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-07-09

Total views
866 ( #3,714 of 50,239 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #10,116 of 50,239 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.