Unconsidered Intentional Actions: An Assessment of Scaife and Webber's 'Consideration Hypothesis'

Journal of Moral Philosophy (1):1-22 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The ‘Knobe effect’ is the name given to the empirical finding that judgments about whether an action is intentional or not seems to depend on the moral valence of this action. To account for this phenomenon, Scaife and Webber have recently advanced the ‘Consideration Hypothesis’, according to which people’s ascriptions of intentionality are driven by whether they think the agent took the outcome in consideration when taking his decision. In this paper, I examine Scaife and Webber’s hypothesis and conclude that it is supported neither by the existing literature nor by their own experiments, whose results I did not replicate, and that the ‘Consideration Hypothesis’ is not the best available account of the ‘Knobe Effect’.
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COVUIA
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-06-20
Latest version: 2 (2013-05-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-20

Total downloads
178 ( #14,334 of 37,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #22,931 of 37,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.