Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”?

Critical Review 29 (3):265-292 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACT“Evidence-based” methods, which most prominently include randomized controlled trials, have gained increasing purchase as the “gold standard” for assessing the effect of public policies. But the enthusiasm for evidence-based research overlooks questions about the reliability and applicability of experimental findings to diverse real-world settings. Perhaps surprisingly, a qualitative study of British educators suggests that they are aware of these limitations and therefore take evidence-based findings with a much larger grain of salt than do policy makers. Their experience suggests that the real world is more heterogeneous than the world imagined by evidence-based policy enthusiasts.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COWRCT
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-21

Total views
132 ( #22,299 of 42,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #23,331 of 42,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.