Does epistemological holism lead to meaning holism?

Topoi 21 (1-2):25-45 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There are various proposals for a general characterization of holism1. In this paper I propose the following: a variety of holism is the view that every X of an appropriate kind, which is part of a relevant whole W, cannot be legitimately separated or taken in isolation from W. Then, I distinguish two general kinds of holism, depending on two different reasons which can debar us from taking X in isolation from W. One reason can be that separating X from W always amounts to transforming X into something else. Correspondingly, a strong holism is the view that if the whole W is modified anywhere, X ceases to be X and becomes something else. Another reason why it may be illegitimate to consider X in isolation from W can be that if we separate X from W, nothing that we know entitles us to exclude that X might be transformed into something else. Correspondingly, virtual holism is the view that if the whole W is modified anywhere, we can never rule out that X ceases to be X and becomes something else.
Reprint years
2004
PhilPapers/Archive ID
COZDEH
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Copernican Turn in Semantics.Cesare Cozzo - 2008 - Theoria 74 (4):295-317.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
917 ( #2,135 of 40,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
114 ( #3,753 of 40,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.