Propositional or Non-Propositional Attitudes?

Philosophical Studies 168 (1):179-210 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Propositionalism is the view that intentional attitudes, such as belief, are relations to propositions. Propositionalists argue that propositionalism follows from the intuitive validity of certain kinds of inferences involving attitude reports. Jubien (2001) argues powerfully against propositions and sketches some interesting positive proposals, based on Russell’s multiple relation theory of judgment, about how to accommodate “propositional phenomena” without appeal to propositions. This paper argues that none of Jubien’s proposals succeeds in accommodating an important range of propositional phenomena, such as the aforementioned validity of attitude-report inferences. It then shows that the notion of a predication act-type, which remains importantly Russellian in spirit, is sufficient to explain the range of propositional phenomena in question, in particular the validity of attitude-report inferences. The paper concludes with a discussion of whether predication act-types are really just propositions by another name.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRAPON
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-04-15
Latest version: 1 (2014-03-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Quine, W. V.
The Things We Mean.Schiffer, Stephen

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Models for Counterparts.Torza, Alessandro

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-03-15

Total downloads
476 ( #4,620 of 37,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #15,258 of 37,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.