Why indeed? Papineau on Supervenience

Analysis 51 (1):32-7 (1991)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
David Papineau's question, 'Why Supervenience?' [5], is a good one. The thesis that the mental supervenes on the physi- cal is widespread, but has rarely been defended by detailed argument. Believers in supervenience should be grateful to Papineau for coming to their aid; but I think they will be disappointed in the argument he gives. In what follows, I shall show that Papineau's argument for supervenience relies on a premiss that is either trivial or as contentious as supervenience itself.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRAWIP
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
416 ( #13,340 of 58,412 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #12,298 of 58,412 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.