Malthus and Ricardo on Economic Methodology

History of Political Economy 28 (3):475-511 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper is a comparative study of the methodologies of Malthus and Ricardo. Its claims are: (i) economic laws almost always admit of exceptions for Malthus; for Ricardo even contingent predictions allow no exception apart from random temporary variations; (ii) both rely on the prestigious Newtonian paradigm, while interpreting it according to two distinct methodological traditions (the one deriving from MacLaurin, the other from Priestley); (iii) the choice of stressing what happens during intervals or in permanent states leads to opposing definitions of the main problem of economic science in so far as equilibrium is always already given for Ricardo and is never given for Malthus; (iv) their use of the ambiguous notion of "tendency" leaves unclear for both the degree of predictive power with which theories are endowed; (v) what both share is the idea of a natural order and this idea is the source of both shortcomings and endless disagreement.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CREMAR-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ricardo and the Utilitarians.Cremaschi, Sergio Volodia Marcello

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-19

Total views
140 ( #27,599 of 50,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #9,594 of 50,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.