S Rashid, The Myth of Adam Smith [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
My objections are: first, we may ask whether the achievement of The Wealth of Nations has been that of creating a new and more encompassing conceptual framework where already existing theoretical elements could be integrated and whether the growth of knowledge could have originated from a growth in the consistency of a theoretical framework which synthesized already existing individual elements; secondly, we may ask whether Smith's "tendentious" presentation of the positions of both predecessors and opponents might be some kind of unavoidable sin and he might have been guilty of that sin because this was a price to be paid to his rhetorical strategy; thirdly, whether the fact that a text has been canonized at a certain moment in history for quite contingent reasons is no decisive proof of the intrinsic worth or lack of worth of the text in itself.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRESRT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-04-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-04-25

Total views
20 ( #51,609 of 52,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #30,068 of 52,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.