God and Moral Knowledge

In Kevin Vallier & Joshua Rasmussen (eds.), A New Theist Response to the New Atheists. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 33-46 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this chapter, we will investigate the ramifications of moral knowledge for naturalism (roughly, the view that all that exists is the natural world). Specifically, we will draw attention to a certain problem we face if the world is purely naturalistic. We will then show how theism provides resources for solving this problem. We’ll argue that the fact that we have lots of moral knowledge fi ts better with theism than with naturalism. Specifically, we’ll present reasons to think that (1) naturalists who think we have lots of moral knowledge will have trouble rationally maintaining both their naturalism and their belief that we have such knowledge and (2) theism better explains the fact that we have lots of moral knowledge than naturalism does.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CRUGAM
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-01-13

Total views
130 ( #33,551 of 56,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
130 ( #4,219 of 56,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.