Objectivity, Scientificity, and the Dualist Epistemology of Medicine

In P. Huneman (ed.), Classification, Disease, and Evidence. Springer Science + Business. pp. 01-17 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper considers the view that medicine is both “science” and “art.” It is argued that on this view certain clinical knowledge – of patients’ histories, values, and preferences, and how to integrate them in decision-making – cannot be scientific knowledge. However, by drawing on recent work in philosophy of science it is argued that progress in gaining such knowledge has been achieved by the accumulation of what should be understood as “scientific” knowledge. I claim there are varying degrees of objectivity pertaining to various aspects of clinical medicine. Hence, what is often understood as constituting the “art” of medicine is amenable to objective methods of inquiry, and so, may be understood as “science”. As a result, I conclude that rather than endorse the popular philosophical distinction between the art and science of medicine, in the future a unified, multifaceted epistemology of medicine should be developed to replace it.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-08-21
View other versions
Added to PP

1,426 (#3,667)

6 months
92 (#7,293)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?