Toward an Epistemology of Art

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An epistemology of art has seemed problematic mainly because of arguments claiming that an essential element of a theory of knowledge, truth, has no place in aesthetic contexts. For, if it is objectively true that something is beautiful, it seems to follow that the predicate “is beautiful” expresses a property – a view asserted by Plato but denied by Hume and Kant. But then, if the belief that something is beautiful is not objectively true, we cannot be said to know that something is beautiful and the path to an epistemology of art is effectively blocked. The article places the existence aesthetic properties in the proper context; presents a logically correct argument for the existence of such properties; identifies strategies for responding to this argument; explains why objections by Hume, Kant, and several other philosophers fail; and sketches a realization account of beauty influenced by Hogarth.
Categories
Reprint years
2016
ISBN(s)
1584-174X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CUSTAE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Physical Realization.Shoemaker, Sydney
On Denoting.Russell, Bertrand

View all 62 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-29

Total views
900 ( #3,388 of 48,824 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
157 ( #2,983 of 48,824 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.