Semicompatibilism: no ability to do otherwise required

Philosophical Explorations 20 (3):308-321 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that it is open to semicompatibilists to maintain that no ability to do otherwise is required for moral responsibility. This is significant for two reasons. First, it undermines Christopher Evan Franklin’s recent claim that everyone thinks that an ability to do otherwise is necessary for free will and moral responsibility. Second, it reveals an important difference between John Martin Fischer’s semicompatibilism and Kadri Vihvelin’s version of classical compatibilism, which shows that the dispute between them is not merely a verbal dispute. Along the way, I give special attention to the notion of general abilities, and, though I defend the distinctiveness of Fischer’s semicompatibilism against the verbal dispute charge, I also use the discussion of the nature of general abilities to argue for the falsity of a certain claim that Fischer and coauthor Mark Ravizza have made about their account.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Freedom Evolves.Dennett, Daniel Clement
An Essay on Free Will.Van Inwagen, Peter
Finkish Dispositions.Lewis, David K.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Responsibility Without General Ability.Cyr, Taylor W. & Swenson, Philip

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #40,257 of 48,864 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #29,631 of 48,864 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.