The Problem of Explanation and Reason-Giving Account of pro tanto Duties in the Rossian Ethical Framework

Public Reason 10 (1):69-80 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Critics often argue that Ross’s metaphysical and epistemological accounts of all-things-considered duties suffer from the problem of explanation. For Ross did not give us any clear explanation of the combination of pro tanto duties, i.e. how principles of pro tanto duties can combine. Following from this, he did not explain how we could arrive at overall justified moral judgements. In this paper, I will argue that the problem of explanation is not compelling. First of all, it is based on the classical account of pro tanto duties. Principles of pro tanto duties can be understood in another way, i.e. in terms of reason-giving account that might be of help to provide a response to the critics. Furthermore, critics fail to see some evidence in Ross about how we can arrive at moral judgements.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Enticing Reasons.Dancy, Jonathan

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
99 ( #33,421 of 50,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #33,837 of 50,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.