The Seeming Account of Self-Evidence: An Alternative to Audian Account

Logos and Episteme 9 (3):261-284 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I argue against the epistemology of some contemporary moral intuitionists who believe that the notion of self-evidence is more important than that of intuition. Quite the contrary, I think the notion of intuition is more basic if intuitions are construed as intellectual seemings. First, I will start with elaborating Robert Audi’s account of self-evidence. Next, I criticise his account on the basis of the idea of “adequate understanding”. I shall then present my alternative account of self-evidence which is based on the seeming account of intuition. Finally, I show how the seeming account of self-evidence can make the moral intuitionist epistemology more tenable.
Categories
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DABTSA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-10-08
Latest version: 2 (2018-10-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Intuition, Self-Evidence,and Understanding.Stratton-Lake Philip - 2016 - In Russ Shafer Landau (ed.), Oxford Studes in Meta Ethics. Oxford: OUP. pp. 28-44.
Self-Evidence.Audi, Robert

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-10-08

Total views
175 ( #20,950 of 45,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #27,074 of 45,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.