Explicitism about Truth in Fiction

British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1):53-65 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The problem of truth in fiction concerns how to tell whether a given proposition is true in a given fiction. Thus far, the nearly universal consensus has been that some propositions are ‘implicitly true’ in some fictions: such propositions are not expressed by any explicit statements in the relevant work, but are nevertheless held to be true in those works on the basis of some other set of criteria. I call this family of views ‘implicitism’. I argue that implicitism faces serious problems, whereas the opposite view is much more plausible than has previously been thought. After mounting a limited defence of explicitism, I explore a difficult problem for the view and discuss some possible responses
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fiction Unlimited.Nathan Wildman & Christian Folde - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1):73-80.
The Trouble with Poetic Licence.Xhignesse, Michel-Antoine

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
615 ( #5,415 of 46,475 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
142 ( #3,645 of 46,475 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.