Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos

Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Suppose a fire broke out in a fertility clinic. One had time to save either a young girl, or a tray of ten human embryos. Would it be wrong to save the girl? According to Michael Sandel, the moral intuition is to save the girl; what is more, one ought to do so, and this demonstrates that human embryos do not possess full personhood, and hence deserve only limited respect and may be killed for medical research. We will argue, however, that no relevant ethical implications can be drawn from the thought experiment. It demonstrates neither that one always ought to let the embryos die, nor does it allow for any general conclusion concerning the moral status of human embryos.
Categories
Reprint years
2007
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAMSSE
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-01-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-02-01

Total views
5,431 ( #139 of 40,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
736 ( #321 of 40,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.