Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos

Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Suppose a fire broke out in a fertility clinic. One had time to save either a young girl, or a tray of ten human embryos. Would it be wrong to save the girl? According to Michael Sandel, the moral intuition is to save the girl; what is more, one ought to do so, and this demonstrates that human embryos do not possess full personhood, and hence deserve only limited respect and may be killed for medical research. We will argue, however, that no relevant ethical implications can be drawn from the thought experiment. It demonstrates neither that one always ought to let the embryos die, nor does it allow for any general conclusion concerning the moral status of human embryos.
Categories
Reprint years
2007
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAMSSE
Upload history
Archival date: 2010-01-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-02-01

Total views
6,768 ( #192 of 54,409 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
602 ( #399 of 54,409 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.