How Berkeley's Works are Interpreted

In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Science and Religion in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Instead of interpreting Berkeley in terms of the standard way of relating him to Descartes, Malebranche, and Locke, I suggest we consider relating him to other figures (e.g., Stoics, Ramists, Suarez, Spinoza, Leibniz). This allows us to integrate his published and unpublished work, and reveals how his philosophic and non-philosophic work are much more aligned with one another. I indicate how his (1) theory of powers, (2) "bundle theory" of the mind, and (3) doctrine of "innate ideas" are understood in a way significantly different from that found in the standard account.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DANHBW
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-30

Total views
118 ( #21,220 of 39,606 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #18,274 of 39,606 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.