How Berkeley's Works are Interpreted

In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Science and Religion in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Instead of interpreting Berkeley in terms of the standard way of relating him to Descartes, Malebranche, and Locke, I suggest we consider relating him to other figures (e.g., Stoics, Ramists, Suarez, Spinoza, Leibniz). This allows us to integrate his published and unpublished work, and reveals how his philosophic and non-philosophic work are much more aligned with one another. I indicate how his (1) theory of powers, (2) "bundle theory" of the mind, and (3) doctrine of "innate ideas" are understood in a way significantly different from that found in the standard account.

Author's Profile

Stephen H. Daniel
Texas A&M University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-30

Downloads
535 (#26,377)

6 months
61 (#62,291)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?