No wisdom in the crowd: genome annotation at the time of big data - current status and future prospects

Microbial Biotechnology 11 (4):588-605 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Science and engineering rely on the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge to make discoveries and create new designs. Discovery-driven genome research rests on knowledge passed on via gene annotations. In response to the deluge of sequencing big data, standard annotation practice employs automated procedures that rely on majority rules. We argue this hinders progress through the generation and propagation of errors, leading investigators into blind alleys. More subtly, this inductive process discourages the discovery of novelty, which remains essential in biological research and reflects the nature of biology itself. Annotation systems, rather than being repositories of facts, should be tools that support multiple modes of inference. By combining deduction, induction and abduction, investigators can generate hypotheses when accurate knowledge is extracted from model databases. A key stance is to depart from ‘the sequence tells the structure tells the function’ fallacy, placing function first. We illustrate our approach with examples of critical or unexpected pathways, using MicroScope to demonstrate how tools can be implemented following the principles we advocate. We end with a challenge to the reader.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology.Allen, Colin; Bekoff, Marc & Lauder, George V. (eds.)

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
50 ( #33,950 of 42,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #25,298 of 42,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.