Formal Theodicy: Religious Determinism and the Logical Problem of Evil

Edukacja Filozoficzna 70:93-119 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Edward Nieznański developed two logical systems to deal with the problem of evil and to refute religious determinism. However, when formalized in first-order modal logic, two axioms of each system contradict one another, revealing that there is an underlying minimal set of axioms enough to settle the questions. In this article, we develop this minimal system, called N3, which is based on Nieznański’s contribution. The purpose of N3 is to solve the logical problem of evil through the defeat of a version of religious determinism. On the one hand, these questions are also addressed by Nieznański’s systems, but, on the other hand, they are obtained in N3 with fewer assumptions. Our approach can be considered a case of logic of religion, that is, of logic applied to religious discourse, as proposed by Józef Maria Bocheński; in this particular case, it is a discourse in theodicy, which is situated in the context of the philosophy of religion.

Author Profiles

Gesiel B. da Silva
University of Missouri, Columbia
Fábio Bertato
Unicamp (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-17

Downloads
517 (#43,935)

6 months
174 (#18,439)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?