A Liberal Anti-Porn Feminism?

Social Theory and Practice 44 (1):21-48 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the 1980s and 1990s, a series of attempts were made to put into U.S. law a civil rights ordinance that would make it possible to sue the makers and distributors of pornography for doing so (under certain conditions). One defence of such legislation has come to be called "the free speech argument against pornography." Philosophers Rae Langton, Jennifer Hornsby and Caroline West have supposed that this defence of the legislation can function as a liberal defence of the legislation: in particular, a defence of the legislation based on the value of women's liberty. This would be somewhat unexpected given MacKinnon's own antipathy toward liberalism. In this paper, I argue that the free speech argument against pornography cannot be used as a liberal defence of the ordinances. The legislation is, to some extent, self-defeating insofar as it understood in terms acceptable to a fairly standard kind of liberal. This becomes apparent when we consider the value pornography can have for women, which we can see if we consider what female makers, distributors and consumers of pornography have to say about why they make, distribute and consume it.
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVALA-8
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Free Speech and Illocution.Langton, Rae & Hornsby, Jennifer

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-10

Total views
379 ( #10,611 of 47,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,300 of 47,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.