Bursting Bubbles? QALYs and Discrimination

Utilitas 31 (2):191-202 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The use of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in healthcare allocation has been criticized as discriminatory against people with disabilities. This article considers a response to this criticism from Nick Beckstead and Toby Ord. They say that even if QALYs are discriminatory, attempting to avoid discrimination – when coupled with other central principles that an allocation system should favour – sometimes leads to irrationality in the form of cyclic preferences. I suggest that while Beckstead and Ord have identified a problem, it is a misdiagnosis to lay it at the feet of an anti-discrimination principle. The problem in fact comes from a basic tension between respecting reasonable patient preferences and other ways of ranking treatment options. As such, adopting a QALY system does not solve the problem they identify.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVBBQ
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Settling for Second Best: When Should Doctors Agree to Parental Demands for Suboptimal Medical Treatment?Nair, Tara; Savulescu, Julian; Everett, Jim; Tonkens, Ryan & Wilkinson, Dominic

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-26

Total views
42 ( #33,119 of 40,103 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #21,793 of 40,103 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.