Communicating by doing something else

In Tamara Dobler & John Collins (eds.), The Philosophy of Charles Travis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 135-154 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It's sometimes thought that context-invariant linguistic meaning must be a character (a function from context types to contents) i.e. that linguistic meaning must determine how the content of an expression is fixed in context. This is thought because if context-invariant linguistic meaning were not a character then communication would not be possible. In this paper, I explain how communication could proceed even if context-invariant linguistic meaning were not a character.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVCBD-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-06-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Relevance, Communication and Cognition.Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
The Varieties of Reference.Antony, Louise M.; Evans, Gareth & McDowell, John
Meaning.Grice, H. Paul

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-12

Total views
96 ( #25,223 of 40,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #12,687 of 40,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.