Enhancement and the Conservative Bias

Philosophy and Technology 30 (3):339-356 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Nicholas Agar argues that we should avoid certain ‘radical’ enhancement technologies. One reason for this is that they will alienate us from current sources of value by altering our evaluative outlooks. We should avoid this, even if enhancing will provide us with novel, objectively better sources of value. After noting the parallel between Agar’s views and G. A. Cohen’s work on the ‘conservative bias’, I explore Agar’s suggestion in relation to two kinds of radical enhancement: cognitive and anti-ageing. With regard to both, there are reasons to doubt Agar’s empirical predictions about the severity of the evaluative changes we will undergo. Nonetheless, there is some force to the argument as applied to cognitive enhancement; in particular, radical cognitive enhancement may endanger our current valuable relationships with our loved ones. However, even if we find this a plausible worry for radical cognitive enhancement, it is not plausible for even radical anti-ageing enhancement, because the change Agar predicts will not affect our core motivations in the way that cognitive enhancement threatens to.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVEAT-21
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-19
Latest version: 2 (2018-11-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-04

Total views
54 ( #41,280 of 50,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #42,586 of 50,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.