On the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer: Response to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I respond to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder’s criticisms of my arguments in another place for the conclusion that human supplicants would have little responsibility (if any) for the result of answered petitionary prayer, and criticize their defense of the claim that God would have good reasons for creating an institution of petitionary prayer.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVOTP
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
60 ( #29,065 of 39,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #23,277 of 39,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.