On the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer: Response to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I respond to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder’s criticisms of my arguments in another place for the conclusion that human supplicants would have little responsibility (if any) for the result of answered petitionary prayer, and criticize their defense of the claim that God would have good reasons for creating an institution of petitionary prayer.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
197 ( #32,515 of 65,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #27,011 of 65,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.