On the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer: Response to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I respond to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder’s criticisms of my arguments in another place for the conclusion that human supplicants would have little responsibility (if any) for the result of answered petitionary prayer, and criticize their defense of the claim that God would have good reasons for creating an institution of petitionary prayer.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVOTP
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
136 ( #30,527 of 53,609 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #20,364 of 53,609 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.