Publish or Perish

Metaphilosophy 48 (5):745-761 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Funds and positions in philosophy should be awarded through systems that are reliable, objective, and efficient. One question usually taken to be relevant is how many publications people have in a group of well-respected journals. In the context of significant competition for jobs and funding, however, relying on quantity of publications creates a serious downside: the oft-lamented demand that we publish or perish. This article offers a systematic review of the problems involved in contemporary academic philosophy, and argues that the resulting situation is bad not just for individual philosophers but also for philosophy itself: we are not working as a discipline to as high a standard as we might. The article then suggests some potential solutions, including some more detailed considerations around what seems a particularly promising option: a professional code of conduct for philosophers.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Theoria Round Table on Philosophy Publishing.Hansson, Bengt; van Ditmarsch, Hans; Engel, Pascal; Hansson, Sven Ove; Hendricks, Vincent; Holm, Søren; Jacobson, Pauline; Meijers, Anthonie; Richardson, Henry S. & Rott, Hans

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
76 ( #22,046 of 34,904 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #10,561 of 34,904 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.