Toward An Ontology of Geo-Reasoning to Aid Response to Weapons of Mass Destruction

American Medical Assoc Conference:400-404 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A startling amount of intelligent activity can be controlled without reasoning or thought. By tuning the perceptual system to task relevant properties a creature can cope with relatively sophisticated environments without concepts. There is a limit, however, to how far a creature without concepts can go. Rod Brooks, like many ecologically oriented scientists, argues that the vast majority of intelligent behaviour is concept-free. To evaluate this position I consider what special benefits accrue to concept-using creatures. Concepts are either necessary for certain types of perception, learning, and control, or they make those processes computationally simpler. Once a creature has concepts its capacities are vastly multiplied.

Author Profiles

David Kirsh
University of California, San Diego
Nick Peterson
Georgia Southern University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-20

Downloads
422 (#56,587)

6 months
99 (#55,569)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?