The Case for an Autonomy-Centred View of Physician-Assisted Death

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (3):345-356 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most people who defend physician-assisted death (PAD) endorse the Joint View, which holds that two conditions—autonomy and welfare—must be satisfied for PAD to be justified. In this paper, we defend an Autonomy Only view. We argue that the welfare condition is either otiose on the most plausible account of the autonomy condition, or else is implausibly restrictive, particularly once we account for the broad range of reasons patients cite for desiring PAD, such as “tired of life” cases. Moreover, many of the common objections to an Autonomy Only view fail once we understand the extent of the autonomy condition’s requirements—in particular, the importance of one’s values for autonomous choices. If our view is correct, then the scope of permissible PAD is broader than is currently accepted in both the philosophical literature and the law, and therefore poses an important challenge to this widely accepted view on justified PAD.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVTCF-11
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-01-15

Total views
211 ( #24,877 of 57,056 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #8,743 of 57,056 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.