The Case for an Autonomy-Centered View of Physician-Assisted Death

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-12 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most people who defend physician-assisted death (PAD) endorse the Joint View, which holds that two conditions—autonomy and welfare—must be satisfied for PAD to be justified. In this paper, we defend an Autonomy Only view. We argue that the welfare condition is either otiose on the most plausible account of the autonomy condition, or else is implausibly restrictive, particularly once we account for the broad range of reasons patients cite for desiring PAD, such as “tired of life” cases. Moreover, many of the common objections to an Autonomy Only view fail once we understand the extent of the autonomy condition’s requirements—in particular, the importance of one’s values for autonomous choices. If our view is correct, then the scope of permissible PAD is broader than is currently accepted in both the philosophical literature and the law, and therefore poses an important challenge to this widely accepted view on justified PAD.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVTCF-11
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Defense of Abortion.Thomson, Judith Jarvis
Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics.Brower, Bruce & Sumner, L. W.
Life's Dominion.Lane, Melissa & Dworkin, Ronald
Imagining Oneself Otherwise.Mackenzie, Catriona

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-01-15

Total views
87 ( #35,350 of 50,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #5,832 of 50,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.