Using "not tasty" at the dinner table

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
John MacFarlane argues against objectivism about “tasty”/”not tasty” in the following way. If objectivism were true then, given that speakers use “tasty”/”not tasty” in accordance with a rule, TP, speakers would be using an evidently unreliable method to form judgements and make claims about what is tasty. Since this is implausible, objectivism must be false. In this paper, I describe a context in which speakers deviate from TP. I argue that MacFarlane's argument against objectivism fails when applied to uses of “not tasty” within this context. So objectivism about “not tasty” is still a viable position within this context.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DAVUQT
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-09-02
Latest version: 3 (2016-09-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-09-02

Total views
235 ( #26,574 of 2,448,402 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #34,069 of 2,448,402 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.