Using "not tasty" at the dinner table

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
John MacFarlane argues against objectivism about “tasty”/”not tasty” in the following way. If objectivism were true then, given that speakers use “tasty”/”not tasty” in accordance with a rule, TP, speakers would be using an evidently unreliable method to form judgements and make claims about what is tasty. Since this is implausible, objectivism must be false. In this paper, I describe a context in which speakers deviate from TP. I argue that MacFarlane's argument against objectivism fails when applied to uses of “not tasty” within this context. So objectivism about “not tasty” is still a viable position within this context.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-09-02
Latest version: 3 (2016-09-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Negotiating Taste.Barker, Chris

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
156 ( #25,820 of 50,193 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #16,713 of 50,193 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.