What is wrong with intelligent design?

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely "specified complexity" (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a designer: an eliminative argument, an inductive argument, and an inference to the best explanation. Only the first of these merits the abuse directed at it; the other two arguments are worthy of respect. If they fail, it is only because we have a better explanation of SC, namely Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection

Author's Profile

Gregory W. Dawes
University of Otago


Added to PP

1,378 (#4,048)

6 months
151 (#3,505)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?