Rationalization as performative pretense

Philosophical Psychology 28 (7):980-1000 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Rationalization in the sense of biased self-justification is very familiar. It's not cheating because everyone else is doing it too. I didn't report the abuse because it wasn't my place. I understated my income this year because I paid too much in tax last year. I'm only a social smoker, so I won't get cancer. The mental mechanisms subserving rationalization have been studied closely by psychologists. However, when viewed against the backdrop of philosophical accounts of the regulative role of truth in doxastic deliberation , rationalization can look very puzzling. Almost all contemporary philosophers endorse a version of the thesis of deliberative exclusivity—a thinker cannot in full consciousness decide whether to believe that p in a way that issues directly in forming a belief by adducing anything other than considerations that he or she regards as relevant to the truth of p. But, as I argue, rationalization involves the weighing of considerations that the thinker kn..
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-09-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doxastic Deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
The Aim of Belief.Wedgwood, Ralph

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
198 ( #13,405 of 37,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #14,379 of 37,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.