Updating Incoherent Credences - Extending the Dutch Strategy Argument for Conditionalization

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we ask: how should an agent who has incoherent credences update when they learn new evidence? The standard Bayesian answer for coherent agents is that they should conditionalize; however, this updating rule is not defined for incoherent starting credences. We show how one of the main arguments for conditionalization, the Dutch strategy argument, can be extended to devise a target property for updating plans that can apply to them regardless of whether the agent starts out with coherent or incoherent credences. The main idea behind this extension is that the agent should avoid updating plans that increase the possible sure loss from Dutch strategies. This happens to be equivalent to avoiding updating plans that increase incoherence according to a distance-based incoherence measure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEBUIC-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-07-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-07-24

Total views
96 ( #45,301 of 2,449,002 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #5,959 of 2,449,002 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.