Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper examines the cognitive foundations of natural theology: the intuitions that provide the raw materials for religious arguments, and the social context in which they are defended or challenged. We show that the premises on which natural theological arguments are based rely on intuitions that emerge early in development, and that underlie our expectations for everyday situations, e.g., about how causation works, or how design is recognized. In spite of the universality of these intuitions, the cogency of natural theological arguments remains a matter of continued debate. To understand why they are controversial, we draw on social theories of reasoning and argumentation.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DECIAA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-09-02
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?Bourget, David & Chalmers, David J.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-06-19

Total views
142 ( #25,103 of 46,447 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #13,005 of 46,447 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.