What Could It Mean to Say That Today's Stand‐Up Audiences Are Too Sensitive?

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (4):501-512 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary comedy audiences are accused by some comedians of being too morally sensitive to appreciate humor. To get closer to an idea of what this means, I will first briefly present the argument over audience sensitivity as found in the non-philosophical literature. Second, I then turn to the philosophical literature and begin from the idea that “funny” is a response-dependent property. I present a criticism of this response-dependence account of “funny” based in the claim that funniness is not de- termined by what normal audiences actually laugh at, but by what merits laughter. Third, I argue that excessive or deficient moral sensitivity distorts audience receptivity to humor. Fourth, I turn to candidates for ideally sensitive audiences. I conclude by returning to the particular cases of supposed oversensitivity or undersensitivity to jokes to see how we might judge them.

Author's Profile

Phillip Deen
University of New Hampshire, Manchester

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
196 (#39,712)

6 months
109 (#6,080)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?