Scientific Progress, Understanding, and Knowledge: Reply to Park

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Dellsén has recently argued for an understanding-based account of scientific progress, the noetic account, according to which science makes cognitive progress precisely when it increases our understanding of some aspect of the world. I contrast this account with Bird’s ; epistemic account, according to which such progress is made precisely when our knowledge of the world is increased or accumulated. In a recent paper, Park criticizes various aspects of my account and his arguments in favor of the noetic account as against Bird’s epistemic account. This paper responds to Park’s objections. An important upshot of the paper is that we should distinguish between episodes that constitute and promote scientific progress, and evaluate account of scientific progress in terms of how they classify different episodes with respect to these categories.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowing How.Stanley, Jason & Willlamson, Timothy
The Scientific Image.Friedman, Michael
The Scientific Image.Demopoulos, William & van Fraassen, Bas C.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
201 ( #21,592 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #20,500 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.