Honour (draft of entry for Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Given its psychological and sociological importance, especially in non-liberal societies, honor may be the most undertheorized normative phenomenon. Philosophical neglect of honor is due partly to the doubtful moral bona fides of honor: honor-typical motives have been usually viewed by philosophers in both the Christian and liberal West as either non-moral or immoral but replaced by morally sounder ones. More practically, honor (and what is usually translated into the English “honor”) connotes a number of apparently contradictory meanings, further bedeviling analyses. Four particularly salient conceptions of honor emerge in the anthropological, literary, and philosophical literature on honor: honor as prestige, honor as the ethos characteristic of “cultures of honor,” honor as honestas, and honor as agonism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEMH-5
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-07-15
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-07-15

Total views
91 ( #37,460 of 53,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,324 of 53,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.