There’s Some Fetish in Your Ethics: A limited defense of purity reasoning in moral discourse

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Call the ethos understanding rightness in terms of spiritual purity and piety, and wrongness in terms of corruption and sacrilege, the “fetish ethic.” Jonathan Haidt and his colleagues suggest that this ethos is particularly salient to political conservatives and non-liberal cultures around the globe. In this essay, I point to numerous examples of moral fetishism in mainstream academic ethics. Once we see how deeply “infected” our ethical reasoning is by fetishistic intuitions, we can respond by 1) repudiating the fetishistic impulse, by 2) “sublimating” our fetishism into liberal rationales, or by 3) accepting the fetishism on its own terms. Of these options, I argue that sublimating our fetishism is not advisable, and that embracing our ethical fetishism isn’t as obviously misguided as some suggest.
Reprint years
2013
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEMTSF-3
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-09-23
Latest version: 2 (2016-04-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-09-23

Total views
1,886 ( #1,574 of 58,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
97 ( #6,232 of 58,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.