‘Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered

Philosophia 38 (4):741-753 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article is a response to Clifford Williams’s claim that the debate between A- and B theories of time is misconceived because these theories do not differ. I provide some missing support for Williams’s claim that the B-theory includes transition, by arguing that representative B-theoretic explanations for why we experience time as passing (even though it does not) are inherently unstable. I then argue that, contra Williams, it does not follow that there is nothing at stake in the A- versus B debate.

Author's Profile

Natalja Deng
Yonsei University


Added to PP

315 (#26,947)

6 months
40 (#25,435)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?