Our Experience of Passage on the B-Theory

Erkenntnis 78 (4):713-726 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Elsewhere I have suggested that the B-theory includes a notion of passage, by virtue of including succession. Here, I provide further support for that claim by showing that uncontroversial elements of the B-theory straightforwardly ground a veridical sense of passage. First, I argue that the B-theory predicts that subjects of experience have a sense of passivity with respect to time that they do not have with respect to space, which they are right to have, even according to the B-theory. I then ask what else might be involved in our experience of time as passing that is not yet vindicated by the B-theoretic conception. I examine a recent B-theoretic explanation of our ‘illusory’ sense of passage, by Robin Le Poidevin, and argue that it explains away too much: our perception of succession poses no more of a problem on the B-theory than it does on other theories of time. Finally, I respond to an objection by Oreste Fiocco that a causal account of our sense of passage cannot succeed, because it leaves out the ‘phenomenological novelty’ of each moment.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DENOEO
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-09-19
Latest version: 2 (2019-01-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-05-18

Total views
461 ( #9,697 of 52,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #15,108 of 52,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.