On the Humphrey Objection to Modal Realism

Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (2):159-179 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An intuitive objection to modal realism is that merely possible worlds and their inhabitants seem to be irrelevant to an analysis of modality. Kripke originally phrased the objection in terms of being concerned about one’s modal properties without being concerned about the properties one’s other-worldly counterparts have. The author assesses this objection in a variety of forms, and then provides his own formulation that does not beg the question against the modal realist. Finally, the author considers two potential answers to the objection so understood and concludes that only one of them has a chance of succeeding.
Categories
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEOTH-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-10-08
Latest version: 2 (2018-10-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causation.Lewis, David
Defining 'Intrinsic'.Langton, Rae & Lewis, David
Are Shapes Intrinsic?Skow, Bradford

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-10

Total downloads
68 ( #25,353 of 37,126 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #8,641 of 37,126 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.