Better Semantics for the Pure Logic of Ground

Analytic Philosophy 56 (3):229-252 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Philosophers have spilled a lot of ink over the past few years exploring the nature and significance of grounding. Kit Fine has made several seminal contributions to this discussion, including an exact treatment of the formal features of grounding [Fine, 2012a]. He has specified a language in which grounding claims may be expressed, proposed a system of axioms which capture the relevant formal features, and offered a semantics which interprets the language. Unfortunately, the semantics Fine offers faces a number of problems. In this paper, I review the problems and offer an alternative that avoids them. I offer a semantics for the pure logic of ground that is motivated by ideas already present in the grounding literature, and for which a natural axiomatization capturing central formal features of grounding is sound and complete. I also show how the semantics I offer avoids the problems faced by Fine’s semantics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On Weak Ground.Derosset, Louis

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
200 ( #16,941 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,485 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.