Present and future trajectories towards a possible valid and useful diagnosis of ADHD

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
To date, diagnosing Attention Defi cit Hyperactivity Disorder remains indeed one of the most controversial issues in contemporary psychiatry and behavioural sciences. Most of the conceptual problems regarding the validity of this diagnostic category arise from the heterogeneity of syndromal pictures and the high rate of comorbidity observed in subjects diagnosed with ADHD at all stages of the longitudinal course of the disorder. In this regard, DSM 5 increased complexity by allowing a diagnosis of comorbidity between ADHD and autism spectrum disorders while these two diagnoses were mutually exclusive in DSM-IV-TR.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DERPAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-08-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
ADHD, Truth, and the Limits of Scientific Method.Gordon Tait - 2009 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):50-51.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Scientific Epistemology.Steven Thurber, William Sheehan & Richards J. Roberts - 2009 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):33-39.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-16

Total views
59 ( #34,200 of 43,724 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #33,854 of 43,724 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.